intervention: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, action
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.67
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.67
, exposure
Weight: 0.63
, screening
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
affect quality 0.81
has quality difference 0.80
has quality effect 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(program, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(exposure, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(exposure, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(screening, has quality effect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(vaccination, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(exposure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(exposure, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vaccination, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(exposure, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(exposure, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(testing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(exposure, affect quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(screening, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(screening, has quality effect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(intervention, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(exposure, affect quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(exposure, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(screening, has quality effect)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(exposure, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vaccination, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(intervention, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)