exposure: affect quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents intervention
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
, composition
Weight: 0.59
, danger
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings presence
Weight: 0.32
, risk
Weight: 0.32
, light source
Weight: 0.32
, protection
Weight: 0.32
, understanding
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect quality 1.00
affect health 0.84
affect quality of picture 0.83
has quality good 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
improve health 0.79
affect human health 0.78
affect strength 0.78
affect growth 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(exposure, affect quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(light source, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(protection, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(exposure, affect quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(understanding, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(protection, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protection, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(light source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(light source, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(exposure, affect quality)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(exposure, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(exposure, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(exposure, improve health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality of picture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(exposure, affect health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(exposure, improve health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect growth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(exposure, affect health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(exposure, affect strength)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(exposure, affect strength)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(exposure, affect health)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect strength)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect human health)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(exposure, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(exposure, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(exposure, affect growth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(exposure, affect strength)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(exposure, improve health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(exposure, affect human health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(exposure, affect quality of picture)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(exposure, affect human health)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(exposure, affect human health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(exposure, improve health)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(exposure, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(exposure, affect growth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(exposure, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(exposure, affect quality of picture)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(exposure, affect quality of picture)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(exposure, affect growth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(exposure, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(exposure, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(exposure, affect quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(understanding, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(exposure, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)