risk: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.67
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
, attribute
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings high blood pressure
Weight: 0.71
, drug use
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.63
, obesity
Weight: 0.62
, interest
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(interest, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(interest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(interest, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(obesity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(obesity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(obesity, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(high blood pressure, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(high blood pressure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(high blood pressure, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(risk, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, has quality worth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(risk, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality worth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(risk, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(interest, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(obesity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(high blood pressure, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(high blood pressure, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality bad)