testing: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents experiment
Weight: 0.65
, intervention
Weight: 0.61
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, practice
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings screening
Weight: 0.59
, test
Weight: 0.38
, vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.31
, example
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality standard 0.81
has quality effect 0.78
be good for business 0.76
has quality accuracy 0.76
be necessarily bad for children 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(experiment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(experiment, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(experiment, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(vaccination, be necessarily bad for children)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(experiment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vaccination, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vaccination, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(test, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(test, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(test, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(vaccination, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(vaccination, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(screening, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(screening, has quality effect)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(testing, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(testing, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(test, has quality accuracy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(test, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(screening, has quality effect)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(vaccination, has quality bad)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)