test: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stress test
Weight: 0.75
, experiment
Weight: 0.69
, indicator
Weight: 0.62
, measure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings amniocentesis
Weight: 0.66
, urinalysis
Weight: 0.65
, electrocardiogram
Weight: 0.55
, x ray
Weight: 0.54
, echocardiogram
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality standard 0.83
has quality accuracy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(experiment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(stress test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(stress test, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(stress test, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(experiment, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(stress test, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(experiment, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stress test, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stress test, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(x ray, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(x ray, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(experiment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(test, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(stress test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(test, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(stress test, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(test, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(x ray, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(x ray, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(x ray, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(x ray, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(test, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(test, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(test, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(test, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(test, has quality accuracy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(test, has quality accuracy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(test, has quality accuracy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality accuracy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(stress test, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(stress test, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(x ray, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(x ray, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(stress test, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(stress test, has quality worth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(experiment, has quality good)