electrocardiogram: has quality worth

Related concepts

Parents	heart disease Weight: 0.57 , test Weight: 0.55 , testing Weight: 0.53 , signal Weight: 0.53 , recording Weight: 0.51
Siblings	atrial fibrillation Weight: 0.34 , angina pectoris Weight: 0.34 , blood clot Weight: 0.34 , coronary artery Weight: 0.34 , echocardiogram Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality worth	1.00
has quality good	0.85
has quality bad	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(testing, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(test, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(test, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(test, has quality bad)

...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(test, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good)

...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(testing, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(test, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(electrocardiogram, has quality good)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality good)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality good)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(test, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(test, has quality bad)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)

...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(test, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(test, has quality bad)

...