urinalysis: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents test
Weight: 0.65
, testing
Weight: 0.43
, search
Weight: 0.43
, evaluation
Weight: 0.43
, method
Weight: 0.41
Siblings stress test
Weight: 0.35
, amniocentesis
Weight: 0.32
, echocardiogram
Weight: 0.31
, electrocardiogram
Weight: 0.31
, angiogram
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be for good 0.85
be for azcanta good 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
has quality function 0.78
has quality question 0.77
has quality accuracy 0.77
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(evaluation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(search, be for good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(search, be for azcanta good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(test, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(search, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(evaluation, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(evaluation, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(test, has quality accuracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(test, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(evaluation, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(test, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(testing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(search, be for azcanta good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(search, be for good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(test, has quality accuracy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(evaluation, has quality question)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(evaluation, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(search, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(search, be for azcanta good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(testing, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(search, be for good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(search, has quality function)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, has quality question)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(test, has quality accuracy)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stress test, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stress test, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(evaluation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(testing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(testing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(test, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(search, be for good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(search, be for azcanta good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(search, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(evaluation, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(evaluation, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(test, has quality accuracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stress test, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(stress test, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(stress test, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(stress test, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(electrocardiogram, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(urinalysis, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(urinalysis, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(test, has quality accuracy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(evaluation, has quality questions)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(evaluation, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(search, has quality function)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(test, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(evaluation, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(search, be for good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(search, be for azcanta good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(stress test, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(stress test, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(electrocardiogram, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(test, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(testing, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(evaluation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(test, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(search, be for good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(search, be for azcanta good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(test, has quality accuracy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(evaluation, has quality question)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(evaluation, has quality questions)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(urinalysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(search, has quality function)