blowfish: be at fancy seafood restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.55
, act
Weight: 0.46
, celebrity
Weight: 0.41
, people
Weight: 0.40
Siblings drake
Weight: 0.31
, chef
Weight: 0.31
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.31
, herring
Weight: 0.30
, gill
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fancy seafood restaurant 1.00
be at sushi restaurant 0.88
be at expensive sushi restaurant 0.88
be at restaurant 0.86
be at sushi bar kitchen 0.85
be at sushi bar 0.84
work at restaurant 0.83
be at japanese sushi restaurant 0.83
cook for fine restaurant 0.82
cook gourmet food 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chef, work at restaurant)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook gourmet food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chef, cook gourmet food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chef, cook gourmet food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chef, work at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chef, work at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at japanese sushi restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at japanese sushi restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at japanese sushi restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at japanese sushi restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, work at restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(chef, cook gourmet food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)