blowfish: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.55
, act
Weight: 0.46
, celebrity
Weight: 0.41
, people
Weight: 0.40
Siblings drake
Weight: 0.31
, chef
Weight: 0.31
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.31
, herring
Weight: 0.30
, gill
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
work at restaurant 0.95
be at sushi restaurant 0.90
be at expensive sushi restaurant 0.87
be at sushi bar kitchen 0.86
be at fancy seafood restaurant 0.86
be at resturant 0.85
cook for fine restaurant 0.85
be at sushi bar 0.84
be at upscale japanese restaurant 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chef, work at restaurant)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chef, work at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chef, work at restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chef, be at resturant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at sushi restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at upscale japanese restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at upscale japanese restaurant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at upscale japanese restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at expensive sushi restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at sushi bar kitchen)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at sushi bar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at fancy seafood restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at upscale japanese restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, work at restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chef, be at resturant)