chef: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.85
be at in restaurant 0.84
be at resturaunt 0.83
work at restaurant 0.82
be find in restaurant 0.82
service to person in restaraunt 0.81
be at cafe 0.77
serve diner 0.76
cook for fine restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cook, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chef, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cook, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cook, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be at resturant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be at resturaunt)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be at restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at in restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be find in restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(waiter, be at cafe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve diner)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cook, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chef, be at resturant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waiter, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at resturant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(kitchen, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be at resturant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(waiter, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(waiter, be at in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at in restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(waiter, be find in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(waiter, be find in restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kitchen, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(waiter, serve diner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(waiter, serve diner)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(waiter, be at cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, be at cafe)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(kitchen, be at resturaunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be at resturaunt)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(waiter, service to person in restaraunt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chef, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, work at restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chef, work at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, cook for fine restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chef, work at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chef, work at restaurant)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chef, cook for fine restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chef, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cook, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waiter, be at resturant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(waiter, be at restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(waiter, be at in restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at resturant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waiter, be find in restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(waiter, serve diner)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waiter, be at cafe)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at resturaunt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waiter, service to person in restaraunt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(chef, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cook, be at restaurant)