boost: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, parameter
Weight: 0.52
, endorsement
Weight: 0.51
Siblings spark
Weight: 0.32
, bump
Weight: 0.31
, dent
Weight: 0.31
, big bang
Weight: 0.31
, hurdle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
have bad service 0.80
has quality service 0.79
is service bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hurdle, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spark, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spark, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spark, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hurdle, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hurdle, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(boost, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boost, is service bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(boost, is service bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(boost, have bad service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boost, have bad service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(boost, have bad service)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(boost, has quality service)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(boost, is service bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(boost, have bad service)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(boost, has quality service)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(boost, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(boost, has quality service)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(boost, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(boost, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(boost, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hurdle, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spark, has quality good)