boot camp: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.63
, opportunity
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.58
, session
Weight: 0.58
Siblings camp
Weight: 0.37
, lock
Weight: 0.32
, carnival
Weight: 0.32
, orientation
Weight: 0.31
, contest
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
is good 0.83
has quality cost 0.81
CAN good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(session, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(session, is good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(opportunity, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(session, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(program, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(session, is good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(session, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(session, is good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(orientation, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lock, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lock, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camp, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(session, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(session, is good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(opportunity, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(orientation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(orientation, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camp, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(camp, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lock, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lock, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lock, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(boot camp, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(boot camp, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(session, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(session, is good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(orientation, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(camp, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lock, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lock, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(session, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(boot camp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(session, is good)