boycott: were effective solution to problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.56
, movement
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, decision
Weight: 0.52
Siblings strike
Weight: 0.33
, ban
Weight: 0.32
, injunction
Weight: 0.32
, lawsuit
Weight: 0.31
, recall
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were effective solution to problem 1.00
were effective solution to problem of taxes 0.93
is effective 0.84
were effective 0.84
be ineffective in system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boycott, is effective)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(boycott, is effective)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boycott, is effective)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(boycott, is effective)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(boycott, were effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)