boycott: be ineffective in system

Related concepts

Parents	action Weight: 0.59 , method Weight: 0.56 , movement Weight: 0.56 , activity Weight: 0.54 , decision Weight: 0.52
Siblings	strike Weight: 0.33 , ban Weight: 0.32 , injunction Weight: 0.32 , lawsuit Weight: 0.31 , recall Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be ineffective in system	1.00
be ineffective in current system	0.97
is effective	0.77
were effective	0.76
were effective solution to problem	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(method, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(method, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(boycott, is effective)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(boycott, is effective)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(boycott, is effective)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(boycott, is effective)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(boycott, were effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(method, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(method, is effective)