boycott: were effective way protesting

Related concepts

Parents	action Weight: 0.59 , method Weight: 0.56 , movement Weight: 0.56 , activity Weight: 0.54 , decision Weight: 0.52
Siblings	strike Weight: 0.33 , ban Weight: 0.32 , injunction Weight: 0.32 , lawsuit Weight: 0.31 , recall Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were effective way protesting	1.00
be effective form of protest	0.90
be good way to protest	0.90
were used protest	0.88
be successful method of protest	0.84
were effective	0.80
is effective	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(method, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(method, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(boycott, were used protest)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be good way to protest)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(boycott, be good way to protest)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be successful method of protest)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(boycott, were used protest)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(boycott, be good way to protest)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(boycott, were used protest)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(boycott, be successful method of protest)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were used protest)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(boycott, be good way to protest)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(boycott, be successful method of protest)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(boycott, is effective)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(boycott, be successful method of protest)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(boycott, were effective)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(boycott, is effective)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(boycott, is effective)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(boycott, is effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(method, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(method, is effective)