brace: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.52
, character
Weight: 0.49
, part
Weight: 0.49
, service
Weight: 0.48
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.31
, sling
Weight: 0.31
, shield
Weight: 0.31
, knee pad
Weight: 0.31
, cushion
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better than invisalign 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brace, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(brace, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(shield, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(shield, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(shield, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(shield, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(brace, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(brace, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(brace, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(brace, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(brace, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(brace, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brace, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(brace, be better than invisalign)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(brace, be better than invisalign)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(brace, be better than invisalign)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(brace, be better than invisalign)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brace, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shield, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shield, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(brace, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)