shield: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.60
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, show
Weight: 0.56
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.33
, shielding
Weight: 0.32
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.32
, cover
Weight: 0.32
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(shield, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(shield, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shield, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(shield, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shield, good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(shield, good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(shield, good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shield, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)