shield: good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.60
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, show
Weight: 0.56
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.33
, shielding
Weight: 0.32
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.32
, cover
Weight: 0.32
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
good 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.81
be good on adc 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shield, good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(shield, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(shield, be good on adc)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shield, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(shield, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(shield, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(shield, be good on adc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(shield, be good on adc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shield, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shield, be good on adc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(shield, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shield, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(shield, good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shield, good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)