brain: be more better than beauty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neural network
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.67
, computer
Weight: 0.64
, tissue
Weight: 0.62
, nervous system
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pineal gland
Weight: 0.59
, thalamus
Weight: 0.48
, human brain
Weight: 0.39
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more better than beauty 1.00
be better than beauty 0.99
be more important than beauty 0.97
is more organised 0.81
be better than computer 0.77
be more complex than animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be better than computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be more complex than animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(human brain, be more complex than animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(human brain, be more complex than animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(human brain, be better than computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(human brain, be better than computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(brain, be more better than beauty)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(brain, be better than beauty)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(brain, be better than beauty)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brain, be better than beauty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(brain, is more organised)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(brain, be better than computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than beauty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brain, be better than computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brain, is more organised)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(brain, is more organised)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brain, is more organised)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(brain, be more better than beauty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(human brain, be more complex than animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(human brain, be better than computer)