breaking: is good show

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents damage
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.57
, charge
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.51
Siblings stealing
Weight: 0.31
, cracking
Weight: 0.31
, hacking
Weight: 0.31
, tear
Weight: 0.31
, breach
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good show 1.00
is show 0.93
is great 0.78
be considered good 0.77
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(stealing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(stealing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(stealing, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hacking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hacking, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, is good show)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(breaking, is show)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(breaking, is show)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(breaking, is show)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(breaking, be considered good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(breaking, be considered good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(breaking, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(breaking, is great)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(breaking, be considered good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(breaking, is great)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is show)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(breaking, is good show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stealing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hacking, has quality good)