broker: get is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salesperson
Weight: 0.67
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.61
, agent
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aon
Weight: 0.37
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, travel agent
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get is paid 1.00
get paid 0.99
earn 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(salesperson, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(broker, get is paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(broker, get is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(salesperson, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(salesperson, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(broker, get is paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(broker, get is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(travel agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(travel agent, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(broker, get is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(broker, get paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(broker, get paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(broker, get paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(broker, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(broker, earn)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(broker, earn)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(broker, earn)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(broker, earn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(broker, get is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(broker, get is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salesperson, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(travel agent, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(broker, get is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salesperson, get paid)