cacti: has physical part spines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.43
, tool
Weight: 0.36
, storage
Weight: 0.35
Siblings cactus
Weight: 0.32
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.31
, cycad
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part spines 1.00
have spines instead of leaves 0.91
has physical part prickles 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, has physical part spines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cactus, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cactus, has physical part spines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cacti, has physical part spines)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cacti, have spines instead of leaves)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have spines instead of leaves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cacti, have spines instead of leaves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cacti, has physical part prickles)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cacti, has physical part prickles)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cacti, have spines instead of leaves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cacti, has physical part prickles)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cacti, has physical part prickles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cacti, has physical part spines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cacti, has physical part spines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cacti, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cactus, has physical part spines)