cacti: have spines instead of leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.43
, tool
Weight: 0.36
, storage
Weight: 0.35
Siblings cactus
Weight: 0.32
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.31
, cycad
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have spines instead of leaves 1.00
has physical part spines 0.91
have spikes instead of leaves 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, has physical part spines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cactus, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cactus, has physical part spines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cacti, have spines instead of leaves)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cacti, has physical part spines)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cacti, has physical part spines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cacti, has physical part spines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cacti, has physical part spines)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have spikes instead of leaves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cacti, have spikes instead of leaves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cacti, have spikes instead of leaves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cacti, have spikes instead of leaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have spines instead of leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cacti, have spines instead of leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have spines instead of leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cactus, has physical part spines)