calling: is thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.52
, telephone
Weight: 0.51
, call
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.49
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thing 1.00
is now thing 0.96
is bad thing 0.94
be daddy thing 0.82
is explicitly bad thing 0.79
is explicitly thing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(talking, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(talking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(talking, is thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(calling, is thing)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(calling, is now thing)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is now thing)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(calling, is bad thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(calling, is now thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(calling, be daddy thing)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(calling, is thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(talking, is thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(calling, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)