talking: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is too bad thing 0.94
is thing 0.94
is too thing 0.89
is back bad 0.83
is damn hard 0.81
does feel good 0.81
has quality bad 0.79
is parts bad 0.78
be considered weird 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(word, is thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ability, is thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ability, is thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(word, is thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ability, is thing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(word, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(talk, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(word, is thing)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ability, is thing)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(talk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(talk, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(talking, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(talking, is thing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(talking, is thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(talking, is thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(talking, is back bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(talking, is too bad thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is too bad thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(talking, is too thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(talking, is too thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(talking, is damn hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(talking, is too thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(talking, is too bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(talking, is thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talking, is too bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talking, is back bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(talking, is too thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(talking, is damn hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(talking, does feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(talking, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, does feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(talking, be considered weird)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(talking, is damn hard)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(talking, be considered weird)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, is damn hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(talking, be considered weird)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(talking, be considered weird)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(word, is thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ability, is thing)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talk, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(word, is thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ability, is thing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(talking, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)