talking: is back bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is back bad 1.00
is bad thing 0.83
is too bad thing 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
go wrong 0.77
does feel good 0.77
is parts bad 0.76
is damn hard 0.76
be with hard 0.75
is new people hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(thing, go wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(thing, go wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(thing, go wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(talk, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talking, is back bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talking, is back bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(thing, go wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talking, is back bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(talk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(talk, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(talking, is back bad)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(talking, go wrong)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(talking, go wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, go wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(talking, go wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, be with hard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talking, is too bad thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, is damn hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, does feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, be with hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(talking, is new people hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(talking, is too bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(talking, is damn hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(talking, is damn hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(talking, is damn hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(talking, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(talking, does feel good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(talking, be with hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(talking, is new people hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(talking, is new people hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(talking, is bad thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(talking, is too bad thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is too bad thing)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(talking, is new people hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(thing, go wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talk, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(thing, go wrong)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(talking, is back bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)