talking: be with hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with hard 1.00
is hard 0.96
is people hard 0.89
is new people hard 0.86
is damn hard 0.83
is phone hard 0.79
is difficult 0.79
is back bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, be with hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(behavior, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, be with hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(behavior, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, be with hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(behavior, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(behavior, is difficult)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(behavior, is difficult)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(behavior, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(talk, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, be with hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(behavior, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, be with hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(behavior, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, be with hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(talk, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talk, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(talking, be with hard)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(talking, is hard)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(talking, is people hard)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(talking, is new people hard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(talking, is damn hard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(talking, is difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(talking, is hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(talking, is back bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(talking, is difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(talking, is damn hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(talking, is people hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(talking, is phone hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(talking, is new people hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talking, is back bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, is hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(talking, is people hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(talking, is damn hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(talking, is difficult)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(talking, is people hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(talking, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(talking, is new people hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, is damn hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is difficult)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is phone hard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(talking, is new people hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, be with hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, is difficult)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(behavior, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(talk, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(behavior, is hard)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, is difficult)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(talking, be with hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)