talking: is phone hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is phone hard 1.00
is phone difficult 0.93
is phone 0.93
be phone 0.92
be on phone 0.92
is phone awkward 0.85
be phone driving 0.84
is hard 0.80
be with hard 0.79
is people hard 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is phone hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(behavior, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is phone hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(behavior, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(behavior, is hard)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(talk, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone hard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(behavior, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(talk, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talk, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(talking, is phone hard)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(talking, be phone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(talking, is phone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(talking, be phone driving)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(talking, be phone driving)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(talking, be phone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talking, is phone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(talking, be phone driving)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(talking, be phone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(talking, be on phone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talking, be on phone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talking, be on phone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(talking, be phone driving)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(talking, be on phone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(talking, be phone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talking, be with hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, be with hard)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(talking, is phone awkward)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(talking, is people hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(talking, is hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone awkward)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone awkward)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(talking, is people hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(talking, be with hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(talking, is phone awkward)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(talking, is people hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(talking, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(talking, is hard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(talking, is people hard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(talking, be with hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is phone hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(behavior, is hard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(talk, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(behavior, is hard)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(talking, is phone hard) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)