talking: does feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
does feel good 1.00
is bad thing 0.81
feel work 0.81
is too bad thing 0.81
is damn hard 0.79
has quality good 0.78
is too thing 0.77
is back bad 0.77
is thing 0.76
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(word, is thing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ability, is thing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ability, is thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(word, is thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ability, is thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(word, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(talk, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talk, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, does feel good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, does feel good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(word, is thing)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, does feel good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(ability, is thing)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(talking, does feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(talk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talk, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(talk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(talk, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(talking, does feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(talking, is thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(talking, is back bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(talking, feel work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(talking, is damn hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is too bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(talking, is back bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(talking, is thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(talking, is too thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(talking, is thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(talking, is damn hard)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(talking, is thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talking, is back bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(talking, is bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(talking, feel work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(talking, is too bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(talking, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(talking, is too thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(talking, is too thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(talking, is too thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(talking, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(talking, is damn hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(talking, is too bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, feel work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talking, is too bad thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talking, is back bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, is damn hard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(talking, feel work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(talking, does feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(word, is thing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ability, is thing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talk, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(talk, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(word, is thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ability, is thing)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(talking, does feel good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)