camel: be preferred animals in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred animals in desert 1.00
is desert animals 0.93
is good desert animals 0.93
be useful animals in desert 0.91
be harmful animals in desert 0.89
is desert animal 0.89
be good animals ride in desert 0.87
be better than horses in desert 0.87
be in desert 0.87
be important in desert 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(camel, be preferred animals in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(camel, be harmful animals in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(camel, be preferred animals in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, be preferred animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(camel, be preferred animals in desert)