camel: be in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in desert 1.00
be important in desert 0.97
be important to desert 0.97
be good in desert 0.97
live in desert 0.95
be better in desert 0.95
be found in desert 0.94
living in desert 0.93
eat in desert 0.93
stay in desert 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(camel, eat in desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camel, stay in desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camel, eat in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(camel, be found in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camel, be found in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(camel, stay in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(camel, stay in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(camel, be found in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camel, stay in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(camel, be found in desert)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camel, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)