camel: be good in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good in desert 1.00
be better in desert 0.97
be in desert 0.97
be important in desert 0.96
be important to desert 0.96
be good living in desert 0.94
live in desert 0.93
be useful in desert 0.93
is good desert animals 0.93
be good for desert travel 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(camel, be useful in desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(camel, be useful in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(camel, be useful in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(camel, be useful in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)