camel: be important to desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to desert 1.00
be important in desert 1.00
be in desert 0.97
be good in desert 0.96
be useful in desert 0.94
be better in desert 0.94
be important in sahara desert 0.94
be important in desert region 0.93
were useful in desert 0.92
live in desert 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(camel, be useful in desert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(camel, be useful in desert)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(camel, were useful in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(camel, were useful in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(camel, be useful in desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(camel, were useful in desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(camel, be useful in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camel, were useful in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(camel, be important to desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)