camel: live in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in desert 1.00
be in desert 0.95
living in desert 0.95
be good living in desert 0.94
be good in desert 0.93
be important in desert 0.92
eat in desert 0.92
stay in desert 0.92
be important to desert 0.92
be better in desert 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(camel, eat in desert)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camel, eat in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(camel, stay in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camel, stay in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camel, stay in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(camel, stay in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(camel, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)