camel: eat in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat in desert 1.00
be in desert 0.93
live in desert 0.92
be good in desert 0.92
be important to desert 0.91
be important in desert 0.91
stay in desert 0.91
find water in desert 0.91
living in desert 0.90
be better in desert 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(camel, eat in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(camel, find water in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(camel, find water in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(camel, stay in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(camel, find water in desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(camel, stay in desert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camel, stay in desert)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camel, stay in desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(camel, find water in desert)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camel, eat in desert)