camel: be harmful animals in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful animals in desert 1.00
is desert animals 0.94
be useful animals in desert 0.94
is good desert animals 0.93
is desert animal 0.90
be preferred animals in desert 0.89
be good animals ride in desert 0.87
be important in desert 0.86
be important to desert 0.86
be in desert 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(camel, be preferred animals in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(camel, be preferred animals in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(camel, be useful animals in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(camel, be preferred animals in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(camel, be preferred animals in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(camel, be harmful animals in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(camel, be harmful animals in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be harmful animals in desert)