camel: live in deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in deserts 1.00
be used in deserts 0.95
survive in deserts 0.93
be related to deserts 0.93
live in sand deserts 0.93
walk in deserts 0.92
be useful in deserts 0.91
live in desert 0.90
living in desert 0.87
eat in desert 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, live in deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(camel, eat in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camel, eat in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(camel, live in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, live in deserts)