camera: focus images onto film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
focus images onto film 1.00
focus images 0.91
capture images 0.82
store images in camera 0.82
flip images 0.80
capture rectangular images 0.79
reverse images 0.79
be better than film cameras 0.79
be used to film movies 0.79
capture pictures 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camera, focus images onto film)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(digital camera, capture images) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camera, focus images onto film)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camera, focus images onto film)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(digital camera, capture images)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than film cameras)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, capture images)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, store images in camera)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(digital camera, store images in camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(camera, focus images onto film)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(digital camera, capture images) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(camera, focus images onto film)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(digital camera, be better than film cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(camera, focus images onto film)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(camera, focus images onto film)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(camera, store images in camera)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, store images in camera)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camera, reverse images)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(camera, be better than film cameras)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(camera, reverse images)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(camera, store images in camera)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(camera, reverse images)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(camera, reverse images)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(camera, store images in camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(camera, focus images onto film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, capture images)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, capture images)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, store images in camera)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(camera, focus images onto film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than film cameras)