camera: need focus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
need focus 1.00
have focus 0.97
focus 0.96
know in focus 0.94
know in when focus 0.90
be fixed focus 0.86
be terrible focusing 0.83
focus images 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(digital camera, know in focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camera, need focus)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camera, need focus)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camera, need focus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(digital camera, know in focus)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be terrible focusing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, know in focus)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(digital camera, know in focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(camera, need focus)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, know in when focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(camera, need focus)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(digital camera, be terrible focusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(camera, need focus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(camera, need focus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camera, need focus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camera, need focus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in focus)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, be terrible focusing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in focus)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, know in when focus)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(camera, need focus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(digital camera, be terrible focusing)