camping: be considered bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adventure
Weight: 0.65
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, hobby
Weight: 0.61
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, water sport
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hiking
Weight: 0.57
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.34
, boating
Weight: 0.34
, fishing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered bad 1.00
be bad year 0.80
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(camping, be considered bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(camping, be considered bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be bad year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camping, be considered bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camping, be considered bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(boating, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fishing, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, be bad year)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(camping, be considered bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(camping, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(camping, be considered bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(boating, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fishing, be bad year)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(camping, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)