canberra: was created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, new south wales
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.50
, capital
Weight: 0.46
Siblings brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, sydney
Weight: 0.32
, tasmania
Weight: 0.32
, auckland
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was created 1.00
was established 0.80
was built 0.78
was used built 0.78
was founded 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(brisbane, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(brisbane, was established)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(adelaide, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(adelaide, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(canberra, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(canberra, was built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(canberra, was built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(canberra, was used built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was used built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(canberra, was used built)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was established)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(canberra, was established)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canberra, was built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(canberra, was used built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(canberra, was established)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(canberra, was established)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(canberra, was founded)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was founded)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canberra, was founded)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(canberra, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(canberra, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(adelaide, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brisbane, was established)