canberra: was established

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, new south wales
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.50
, capital
Weight: 0.46
Siblings brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, sydney
Weight: 0.32
, tasmania
Weight: 0.32
, auckland
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was established 1.00
was created 0.80
was built 0.79
was founded 0.78
was used built 0.78
is built 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, was established)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(brisbane, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(brisbane, was established)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(adelaide, was established)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(adelaide, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(canberra, was established)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(canberra, was built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(canberra, was built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(canberra, was built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(canberra, is built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(canberra, is built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(canberra, was used built)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(canberra, was used built)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(canberra, is built)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(canberra, was created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(canberra, is built)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(canberra, was used built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was used built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(canberra, was founded)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(canberra, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(canberra, was founded)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(canberra, was created)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(canberra, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was established)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(canberra, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(adelaide, was established)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was established)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brisbane, was established)