candy: be bad for children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for children 1.00
be bad for kids 0.93
is bad for 0.82
support development of children 0.78
support social development of children 0.77
be addictive for kids 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(snack, support development of children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(candy, be bad for children)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(snack, support social development of children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(candy, be bad for children)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(snack, support social development of children)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(snack, support development of children)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(snack, support development of children)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(snack, support social development of children)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(snack, support development of children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(candy, be bad for children)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(snack, support social development of children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(candy, be bad for children)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(candy, be bad for children)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(candy, be bad for kids)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(candy, be bad for kids)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(candy, be bad for kids)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(candy, is bad for)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(candy, is bad for)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(candy, is bad for)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(candy, be bad for kids)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(candy, is bad for)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candy, be addictive for kids)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(candy, be addictive for kids)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(candy, be addictive for kids)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(candy, be addictive for kids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy, be bad for children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(candy, be bad for children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(snack, support development of children)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(snack, support social development of children)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(snack, support social development of children)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(snack, support development of children)