card: have chips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents smart card
Weight: 0.90
, business card
Weight: 0.79
, credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
Siblings sound card
Weight: 0.79
, wild card
Weight: 0.77
, trading card
Weight: 0.75
, green card
Weight: 0.70
, visa card
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have chips 1.00
be with chips 0.99
use chips 0.98
have rfid chips 0.90
have chip 0.90
be with chips secure 0.90
be with chip 0.89
be with chips more secure 0.89
be with chip supposed 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(debit card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(debit card, have chip) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(credit card, have rfid chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(debit card, have chips)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(credit card, have chips)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(debit card, have chip)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(debit card, have chip)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(debit card, have chips)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have chips)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(card, have chips)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(debit card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(card, have chips)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(debit card, have chip) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(card, have chips)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(credit card, have rfid chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(card, have chips)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(card, have chips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(card, have chips)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(card, use chips)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(card, use chips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(debit card, have chips)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have chips)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(debit card, have chip)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(debit card, have chips)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have chips)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(debit card, have chip)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure)