credit card: be with chips more secure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business card
Weight: 0.83
, smart card
Weight: 0.83
, card
Weight: 0.75
, visa card
Weight: 0.71
Siblings debit card
Weight: 0.77
, account
Weight: 0.67
, american express
Weight: 0.63
, password
Weight: 0.61
, visa
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with chips more secure 1.00
be with chips secure 0.99
be with chips 0.90
have chips 0.89
use chips 0.88
be with numbers more secure 0.85
be with chip 0.84
be with numbers secure 0.83
have chip 0.82
be with chip supposed 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(card, use chips)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(card, have chips)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(debit card, have chip)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(debit card, have chips)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(password, be with numbers more secure)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(password, be with numbers secure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(debit card, have chips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(debit card, have chips)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(password, be with numbers more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(password, be with numbers more secure)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(password, be with numbers secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(password, be with numbers secure)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(debit card, have chip) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(debit card, have chip)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have chips)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(credit card, have chips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(credit card, have chips)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have chips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(debit card, have chips)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(password, be with numbers more secure)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(password, be with numbers secure)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(debit card, have chip)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)