card: use chips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents smart card
Weight: 0.90
, business card
Weight: 0.79
, credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
Siblings sound card
Weight: 0.79
, wild card
Weight: 0.77
, trading card
Weight: 0.75
, green card
Weight: 0.70
, visa card
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
use chips 1.00
have chips 0.98
be with chips 0.97
have rfid chips 0.90
be with chips secure 0.89
be with chips more secure 0.88
have chip 0.87
be with chip 0.87
be with chip supposed 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, have chips)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(debit card, have chips)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(credit card, have rfid chips)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(debit card, have chip)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(debit card, have chips)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(credit card, have chips)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(debit card, have chip)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(debit card, have chip)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be with chips more secure)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(debit card, have chips)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have chips)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, have chips)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(card, use chips)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(debit card, have chips)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(card, use chips)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(credit card, have rfid chips)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(card, use chips)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(credit card, be with chips more secure)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(card, use chips)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(debit card, have chip)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(card, use chips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(card, use chips)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(card, have chips)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(card, have chips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(card, have chips)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(card, have chips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(card, use chips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(debit card, have chips)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have chips)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(debit card, have chip)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(debit card, have chips)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(credit card, have chips)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(credit card, have rfid chips)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(debit card, have chip)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(card, use chips)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(credit card, be with chips more secure)