carnivore: have shorter intestines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have shorter intestines 1.00
have shorter intestine 0.95
have shorter small intestine 0.94
have large intestines 0.92
have small intestines 0.92
has physical part intestines 0.91
have longer intestines than herbivores 0.89
have small large intestines 0.89
have smaller small intestines than herbivores 0.88
have small intestine 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(carnivore, have longer intestines than herbivores)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have longer intestines than herbivores)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have longer intestines than herbivores)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(carnivore, have longer intestines than herbivores)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small intestine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)