carnivore: have small large intestines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have small large intestines 1.00
have large intestines 0.98
have small intestines 0.98
have small intestine 0.93
have smaller small intestines than herbivores 0.91
has physical part intestines 0.90
have shorter small intestine 0.89
have shorter intestines 0.89
have large stomach 0.86
has physical part intestine 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have large stomach)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have large stomach)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(carnivore, have large stomach)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have large stomach)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)