carnivore: have shorter small intestine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have shorter small intestine 1.00
have shorter intestine 0.98
have small intestine 0.95
have shorter intestines 0.94
has physical part intestine 0.90
have small large intestines 0.89
have small intestines 0.89
have large intestines 0.89
have smaller small intestines than herbivores 0.87
has physical part intestines 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestines)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small intestines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, has physical part intestine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(carnivore, have shorter intestine)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small large intestines)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(carnivore, have small intestine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(carnivore, have smaller small intestines than herbivores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(carnivore, have shorter small intestine)