carrot: be good for vision

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tuber
Weight: 0.65
, fresh food
Weight: 0.63
, fruit
Weight: 0.61
, root
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carrot juice
Weight: 0.37
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.34
, crab apple
Weight: 0.34
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.34
, apple juice
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for vision 1.00
be good for night vision 0.96
help vision 0.93
be good for eyes 0.78
be good for us 0.77
has quality good 0.76
be good for eyesight 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for vision)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for vision)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for night vision)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(carrot, be good for eyesight)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for eyes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for eyesight)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for eyesight)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for eyesight)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(carrot, be good for us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(carrot, be good for vision)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(carrot, be good for vision)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)